| |
|
|
The Entire Report in PDF |
Note: This document is very large (306 pages, 12 MB) and may take several minutes to download depending on your internet connection speed. |

U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration |
Annual Report on New Starts |
|
Proposed Allocation of Funds for Fiscal Year 2007 Report of the Secretary of Transportation to the United States Congress Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 5309(k)(1) |

(Cover Photos courtesy of Metro Transit, Minneapolis, MN, San Diego Association of Governments, San Diego, CA, and Sacramento Regional Transit District, Sacramento, CA)
2006 Prepared by: Federal Transit Administration Pursuant to: Title 49, United States Code, Section 5309(k)(1) Available from: Federal Transit Administration Office of Planning and Environment 400 7th Street, SW, Room 9413 Washington, DC 20590 http://www.fta.dot.gov
Letter to The Honorable Richard C. Shelby
Letter to The Honorable Paul S. Sarbanes
Letter to The Honorable Don Young
Letter to The Honorable James L. Oberstar
Table of Contents
Executive Summary Introduction Principles for Funding Recommendations
A Word about Full Funding Grant Agreements
Table 1
FY 2007 Funding Allocations and Recommendations
Existing Full Funding Grant Agreements
Pending Full Funding Grant Agreements NY, New York, Long Island Rail Road East Side Access PA, Pittsburgh, North Shore LRT Connector
Proposed Full Funding Grant Agreements CO, Denver, West Corridor LRT OR, Portland, South Corridor I-205 / Portland Mall LRT OR, Washington County, Wilsonville to Beaverton Commuter Rail TX, Dallas, Northwest/Southeast LRT MOS UT, Salt Lake City, Weber County to Salt Lake City Commuter Rail
Other Projects Washington D.C. Metropolitan Area, Largo Metrorail Extension NY, New York, Second Avenue Subway MOS VA, Norfolk, Norfolk LRT VA, No. Virginia/Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project – Extension to Wiehle Avenue WA, Seattle, University Link LRT Extension
Small Starts Other Funding Transportation in the Parks and Public Lands Program
FY 2007 New Starts Projects and Ratings Contained in this Report
Table 2
Appendix A: New Starts Project Profiles
Appendix B: FY 2007 Evaluation and Rating Process
Figure I-1 New Starts Evaluation Process
Table I-1 FY 2007 Overall Rating Decision Rules Table II-1 New Starts Project Justification Criteria and Supporting Measures and Categories Table II-2 Cost Effectiveness Breakpoints Table II-3 Ratings Applied in Assessment of Land Use Criterion Table III-1 Capital Plan Rating Standards
|